Simple, transparent pricing
Start free with up to 3 reviewers. Upgrade when your team grows, and measure the intervention that moves a stalled PR instead of buying a broad analytics suite.
Get early access
For 8 engineers running 3 repos: $29 × 3 = $87/mo vs. a typical $15 × 8 = $120/mo seat-based alt — save $33/mo before counting the estimated capacity recovered.
Pro is currently waitlisted — get early access via the Free tier form above.
Run the numbers yourself
The same comparison block, parameterized. ShipStream anchors at the bottom of the range on every team — slide the inputs to see the dollar gap widen or narrow for yours.
| Vendor | Per intervention | Annual delta vs ShipStream |
|---|---|---|
| ShipStream AI | $7.20 | — |
| LinearB | $9.00 | $4,320 |
| Graphite | $48.00 | $97,920 |
Closed-form model: per-intervention cost is scaled by your engineers, monthly PR volume, stalled-day budget, and severity-weighted AI finding exposure ($0.40 per weighted finding). Defaults (25 engineers / 200 PRs / 1 day / 10 weighted / 50 raw) reproduce the published $7.20 / $9 / $48 anchor values.
47%
Avg reduction in PR cycle time
$35k+
Annual time recovered at 20 engineers / $180k avg salary / 1 day per sprint
3.2×
Faster review turnaround after reassignment
Based on teams averaging 20 engineers at $180k/yr. A 1-day reduction per 2-week sprint recovers ~$35k in engineering capacity annually.
Why ShipStream?
LinearB
$18–22/user/mo
Seat-based engineering intelligence
Panto
Custom pricing
Review automation with a different scope
ShipStream AI
Free → $12/user/mo
Self-serve review-flow interventions
Capability matrix
The matrix stays limited to supported action states: ShipStream diagnoses a bottleneck and prescribes the next review-flow intervention. It does not represent functional/E2E gate execution or cross-platform agentic governance.
| Action | ShipStream | PR-Agent | Panto | LinearB | Graphite |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reassign | Automated | Human-routed | Human-routed | Human-routed | Human-routed |
| Smart Split | Automated | Human-routed | Human-routed | Human-routed | Human-routed |
| Smart Ping | Automated | Human-routed | Human-routed | Partial | Human-routed |
| Re-request | Automated | Human-routed | Human-routed | Human-routed | Human-routed |
Based on public documentation reviewed August 2026. See the full breakdowns in the comparison posts below.
How ShipStream compares
Pricing model
Operating model
Depth + coverage
Automation depth
Start with the bottleneck signal, choose the intervention, and see the operational outcome your review flow can support.